New York Times

F.B.I. Agent Defends Actions in Russia Probe in Contentious House Testimony

F.B.I. Agent Defends Actions in Russia Probe in Contentious House Testimony


Peter Strzok, the F.B.I. deputy assistant director, said his political opinions had no effect on his work investigating the President Trump’s campaign. He faced attacks from Republican lawmakers, including one who invoked Mr. Strzok’s extramarital affair.Published OnCreditImage by Erin Schaff for The New York Times

WASHINGTON — The embattled F.B.I. agent who oversaw the opening of the Russia investigation mounted an aggressive personal defense on Thursday, rejecting accusations that he let his private political views bias his official actions and labeling Republicans’ preoccupation with him “another victory notch in Putin’s belt.”

“Let me be clear, unequivocally and under oath: not once in my 26 years of defending my nation did my personal opinions impact any official action I took,” the agent, Peter Strzok, told House lawmakers investigating what Republicans say is evidence of rampant bias at the top levels of the F.B.I.

But in defending himself and his agency, Mr. Strzok had to weather hours of blistering attacks by Republicans, whose accusations drifted from personal animus toward President Trump to blatant lying and moral misconduct with a senior F.B.I. lawyer, Lisa Page. It was a remarkable performance by Republicans, long seen as the party of law and order and the defenders of law-enforcement power and prerogatives.

Democrats, on the other side of a now-gaping divide over the F.B.I., repeatedly accused their Republican colleagues of launching their own politically motivated investigation of the investigators to sully the reputation of federal law enforcement, boost Mr. Trump and ignore a hostile foreign power’s attack on American democracy.

In his first public comments since volumes of private text messages between Mr. Strzok and Ms. Page were disclosed, the agent concluded opening remarks with a pointed broadside against his antagonizers.

“I understand we are living in a political era in which insults and insinuation often drown out honesty and integrity,” Mr. Strzok said, continuing: “I have the utmost respect for Congress’s oversight role, but I truly believe that today’s hearing is just another victory notch in Putin’s belt and another milestone in our enemies’ campaign to tear America apart.”

He concluded: “As someone who loves this country and cherishes its ideals, it is profoundly painful to watch and even worse to play a part in.”

[Read Peter Strzok’s opening statement.]

The fiery hearing, convened by House Judiciary and Oversight committees, devolved into a spectacle almost as soon as it began, as pent-up rage between House Republicans and the F.B.I. broke into the open in spectacular fashion, including with an almost immediate threat to hold Mr. Strzok in contempt of Congress after he said the F.B.I. had barred him from answering certain questions.

As the hearing stretched deep into the afternoon, it broke into pandemonium when Representative Louie Gohmert, Republican of Texas, invoked Mr. Strzok’s extramarital affair with Ms. Page.

“I can’t help but wonder when I see you looking there with a little smirk, how many times did you look so innocent into your wife’s eye and lie to her?” he said.

Democrats shouted that the statement was “intolerable witness harassment.” Representative Bonnie Watson Coleman, Democrat of New Jersey, demanded, “Do you need your medication?”

Mr. Strzok, visibly irked, insisted that he had “always told the truth” and shot back that Mr. Gohmert’s invocation of “a family member who I have acknowledged hurting goes more to a discussion about your character and what you stand for.”

Republicans were intent on painting Mr. Strzok as seething with contempt for President Trump and his supporters — and by implication, painting the agency’s investigation of the president as motivated by animus.

“He thinks calling someone destabilizing isn’t bias,” said Representative Trey Gowdy of South Carolina, the chairman of the House Oversight Committee, referencing texts sent by Mr. Strzok. “He thinks protecting the country from someone he hasn’t even begun to investigate isn’t bias. He thinks promising to ‘stop’ someone he is supposed to be fairly investigating from ever becoming president isn’t bias.”

Mr. Gowdy dismissed Mr. Strzok’s defenses, saying that the agent has a “most unusual and largely self-serving definition of bias” that had undermined the fair administration of justice.

To a surprising extent, Mr. Strzok appeared just as intent on defending the F.B.I.’s actions, the integrity of the Russia investigation that continues under Robert S. Mueller III and his own behavior.

Peter Strzok, the F.B.I. deputy assistant director, arrived to testify before the House Committees on the Judiciary and Oversight & Government Reform on Thursday.CreditErin Schaff for The New York Times

“At every step, at every investigative decision, there were multiple layers of people above me, assistant director, deputy director, director of the F.B.I., and multiple layers of people below me, section chiefs, unit chiefs and analysts, all of whom were involved in all of these decisions,” he told Mr. Gowdy after the chairmen pressed him. “They would not tolerate any improper behavior in me any more than I would tolerate it in them.”

“The suggestion that I, in some dark chamber in the F.B.I., would somehow cast aside all of these procedures, all of these safeguards and do this is astounding to me,” he said. “It couldn’t happen.”

For their part, Democrats tried to run interference for Mr. Strzok, using parliamentary points of order and other tactics to protect him from Republican prying. One Democrat, Representative Steve Cohen of Tennessee, said Mr. Strzok deserved a Purple Heart.

“All of these inquiries about your political opinions as revealed by these text messages are irrelevant and wrong, unless it can be shown — as it has not been shown, as was found definitively not to be the case in the Hillary investigation and has not been shown in the Russia investigation — that they affected any decisions in the investigation,” Representative Jerrold Nadler of New York, the top Democrat on the Judiciary Committee, told Mr. Strzok.

Instead, Democrats accused Republicans of attacking a veteran F.B.I. agent to divert attention from a hostile foreign power’s successful effort to interfere in American democracy and promote the election of President Trump.

“There is a criminal investigation into the Trump campaign and possible crimes related to the 2016 presidential election involving collusion with Russian spies to sell out our democracy and hijack the presidency,” said Representative Hakeem Jeffries, Democrat of New York. “My colleagues in the cover-up caucus don’t like that criminal investigation, and therefore, they need to identify a villain. Mr. Strzok, tag, you’re it.”

Mr. Strzok, a career agent, played a pivotal role in two of the bureau’s most politically fraught cases in recent memory: the investigation into Hillary Clinton’s email practices as secretary of state and a separate inquiry into Russia’s attempts to interfere in the 2016 election and its interactions with the Trump campaign. He briefly served on Mr. Mueller’s team, as well, before being removed after the discovery of his text messages with Ms. Page, with whom he was in a romantic relationship.

In one oft-cited exchange from August 2016, Ms. Page, who also worked on both investigations, said to Mr. Strzok that Trump is “not ever going to become president, right?”

“No. No he won’t. We’ll stop it,” Mr. Strzok replied.

Mr. Strzok said on Thursday that he deeply regretted the messages, but that they did not amount to more than private political beliefs. He defended that particular text as a late-night, “off-the-cuff” message after “then-candidate Trump” insulted “the immigrant family of a fallen war hero,” Humayun Khan.

“And my presumption, based on that horrible, disgusting behavior” was “that the American population would not elect somebody demonstrating that behavior to be president of the United States,” he confessed.

He said a broader look at his texts would show disparaging remarks toward all the candidates in the 2016 campaign.

“To suggest we can parse down the shorthand like they’re some contract for a car is simply not consistent with my or most people’s use of text messaging,” Mr. Strzok said in the heated exchange.

House Republicans were not placated by such explanations, and repeatedly instructed Mr. Strzok to read select text messages aloud, amid other questions about prosecutorial decisions in the Clinton case and his interactions with Mr. Mueller.

“What does Trump support smell like?” Representative Robert Goodlatte of Virginia, the Judiciary Committee chairman, asked, referencing one message in which Mr. Strzok wrote he could “SMELL” Trump supporters in a southern Virginia Walmart.

A former Army officer, Mr. Strzok has worked at the F.B.I. for more than two decades. He rose quickly through its ranks, earning a reputation within the bureau as one of its most savvy and reliable counterintelligence agents. It was that reputation and increasingly senior positions that landed him on the teams investigating both Mrs. Clinton and eventually Mr. Trump.

The inspector general’s report was unsparing in its criticism of Mr. Strzok and Ms. Page, but found no evidence that their personal views had affected prosecutorial decisions in the Clinton case. The inspector general, Michael E. Horowitz, continues to investigate the F.B.I.’s handling of key aspects of the Russia case.

The committees have also demanded testimony from Ms. Page, issuing a subpoena for her to appear in private for an interview and threatening her with contempt when she did not meet that deadline. Lawyers for Ms. Page said she was happy to testify, but only after the F.B.I. allowed her to review her notes and relevant case files. After two Republican chairmen issued an ultimatum on Wednesday, Ms. Page was scheduled to take part in a private deposition on Friday and Monday.

Michael S. Schmidt contributed reporting.

Get politics and Washington news updates via Facebook, Twitter and the Morning Briefing newsletter.

Let’s block ads! (Why?)

NYT > Home Page

To Top